The Fengi Newsletter - Being Nowhere is better than not here. [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Greetings Fellow Comstoks!

[ website | Fengi - lies, damn lies and statistics ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| insane friends of friends extrapolation ]

Being Nowhere is better than not here. [Jun. 29th, 2005|02:59 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Share Next Entry
So last weekend I explored the Illinois leg of Route 66. It was a fascinating experience which inspired pleasure and dismay. The sections which were closest to the historical route and businesses felt vital and connected to place, even when the road stretched through flat fields. The parts which were completely modern had that mindnumbingly dull "everywhere yet not anywhere" sensation. Modern corporate design is so drained of style and humanity that old franchise buildings merely as intended as commercial seem like works of art and unique craftsmanship.

Worse were the tracts of new housing. It's not just that they're bufugly - they are unplaces. They have no connection to urban or rural or surburban centers or anything central. Built on the side of freeways and surrouned by empty land or perhaps another development, they have no center at all.

The developments contain no parks, churches, pubs, schools, entertainment/business districts - even strip malls require a car ride. Lord knows where the hospitals are.

Such remoteness is appropriate for humans who actually live off the land. But these are folks who just moved hours from work, culture and commerce. It's a more dangerous risk than the new clean homes imply.

Economically, residents are at the mercy of gas prices and minimal consumer options, some extremely so as they chose such places out of tight budgets. Gas hits $70 a barrel, these people are fucked - they could end up unable to leave home except for necessities.

A scary thought, as such places don't seem socially rational. Save the high end enclaves, most developments are devoid of variety in unit design. Any sense of identity would be based on interiors of home and self. Unlike traditional rural or small towns, there is little to encourage connections with neighbors besides the interior social drive of residents. Though the homes are often closely packed, there is a lonely in a crowd feel.

Looking at such places, you get why church is important, why a certain type of unconsciously selfish religion and politics has arisen, why some believe Iraq had WMDs.* The daily points of reference outside the self is minimal, co-workers, family and media. One can be self-centered anywhere, but a lack of pattern and context encourages it.

The bland infects. In one town, we stopped at a restaurant which was neither quaint greasy spoon nor franchise. The food was dull and inept, almost like aliens were trying to approximate dishes without recipies. Not difficult cuisine either - jalepeno poppers made by rolling tasteless peppers in breadcrumbs and sour cream. My "buffalo chicken" sandwich was a breast filet deep fried in what appeared to be fishstick batter then sprinkled with hot sauce. It wasn't cheap either, but I guess it was cost less and was easier to reach than the nearest Bennigans, so it was packed. Other stops involved other badly done diner fare - it's like the chains had erased the ability to do fast food from scratch.

I can't be hard on people who exile themselves to these unplaces. Assumptions about ownership and cheap individual transportation run deep and counter to reality. Plus the heart of consumerism is a fixed state of potential pleasure which never arrives - sure the location sucks but once one has the homes and a few more goods it will be okay and eventually the promised social center will magically appear, or the nearby town will grow to include you. In the meantime, the in-car DVD player will distract the kids during the hour drive BlahCo Stores, which provides the sole shape to your life outside the pew and the cubicle. It's like making one's home inside the dissociative state of a gambler. How can the rapture or blind patriotism not seem appealing in such a context?
------
*I also get why community center projects which strike me as pork barrel bullshit might actually be a sanity saving item if you live out here.
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]happinesstogo
2005-06-29 08:50 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Wow. Interesting stuff. I saw some of the same type of thing when I was in Ohio last weekend. Since I've been gone there has been a lot of development not far from where my dad lives, in one of these unplaces. Dad and his wife are eager to show me all the stores they have now, and it's pretty much just like seeing a strip mall here in Phoenix: grocery chain, dollar store, Payless Shoes, Michael's, Linens 'n Things, Pier One, cel phone store, etc.

We also saw new homes going up in areas that used to be farm fields when I lived in Ohio. Granted, these homes are a little nicer than the cookie cutter development homes: they have nicer yards, are farther apart from one another and appear to be individual rather than part of a planned development of fifty or more homes at once. However, what I found most interesting in your post today is the risk factor involved in moving out where they live, far away from everything. I think you're right, and I hadn't thought about it much until now.

I remember once when I was a freshman in high school my friend who lived in the country had a sleepover, and I felt so trapped at her house: there was nothing to walk to, no friends who lived around the corner, no place I could go grab a soda. I imagine I would feel the same way as an adult now.
[User Picture]From: [info]lapsedmodernist
2005-06-29 08:53 pm (UTC)

(Link)

did you read [info]imomus' entry yesterday or the day before that about "American texture"? I feel like there is definite intertextuality between your post and his...
[User Picture]From: [info]fengi
2005-06-29 09:15 pm (UTC)

(Link)

DING! It started as a response to both that and his next post about "creative ghettos" vs. real ghettos. I tend to agree with the latter essay more than the former,* but when you combine them the culmulative point is right on.

To me the unclave is a product of both economic and cultural disparity and the people who flock to them are not necessarily the priveleged ones. I mean, when the expensive mobile home park in suburban Joliet a more rich and varied visual sense (and has more signs of creative intelligence) than a hillside of prefab mansions, you know know you've moved into nothere.

I realize that as an American I've trained myself to focus on the soulful in the most bland landscape and tune out the static of bland. And I noticed the bland crappy bits around London and Paris, though few reach American suburb standards. So my disagreement with his snobbery is informed by my own myopia.

I'm also assuming an oppresive ghetto with culture is better than a bland suburb, which is most definitely the myopia of privelege. Except while I can see a former ghetto kid being okay with say, Naperville, which still has a nominal downtown, I can't see them tolerating an unclave.
From: [info]oblomova
2005-06-29 09:03 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Oh but didn't David Brooks write a book positing these developments as the new American paradise?
[User Picture]From: [info]fengi
2005-06-29 09:17 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I'd like to see Dave spend a year 20 minutes outside Atlanta, IL in a condo by I-55 on the salary of a WalMart manager. Dude would blow his brains out by April.
[User Picture]From: [info]grumpygranola
2005-06-29 09:24 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I grew up in central Illinois, not very far from Route 66 and I liked your post because it reminded me why I left so many years ago. I was starting to feel homesick, but now I've regained my senses. Thanks!
[User Picture]From: [info]fengi
2005-06-29 09:46 pm (UTC)

(Link)

Oh I can understand feeling homesick if you lived in, say, Funk's and managed the music pub in Bloomington. Yes, it may be a sleepy life, but it's not a zombie life. It's the areas where it takes 20 minutes at 60 MPH along a road of nothing to go from 200 homes which look exactly alike to a Blockbuster and 7/11 that would make me run.
[User Picture]From: [info]grumpygranola
2005-06-30 01:46 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I grew up in Heyworth IL (b/w Bloomington and Decatur). Population before the tract housing: 1500. Still no 7/11 there. Downtown Normal was a godsend for me. I got lucky and was able to go to Illinois State's lab school but it was a 45 minute drive of nothing each way. Can't say there's much there I miss except family and a few friends still around from high school. I don't miss corn.
[User Picture]From: [info]seriesfinale
2005-06-30 04:48 pm (UTC)

(Link)

I don't know...I've lived in a lot of different environments and I can tell you that there are just as many ignorant people leading empty lives in cities as there are in suburbia. I don't think proximity to, say, sushi bars and independent record stores are the key to leading satisfying or even intellectually-stimulating lives. I don't even see how the "daily points of reference" for the majority of urban bo-bos headed home to Wicker Park/Andersonville/Lakeview/wherever on the train, sealed off from their fellow riders via their ipods or laptops are even that more varied. Are these guys headed to Lawndale or West Pullman on the weekends? Eating lunch in Pilsen or Devon or passing more black folks on the street doesn't really count as truly expanded horizons for me.

Actually, I really do agree with this post for the most part, and there's no way in hell I would want to live out in one of these described developments. It just seems the slightest bit condescending and stereotypical.
[User Picture]From: [info]fengi
2005-06-30 08:22 pm (UTC)

Interesting

(Link)

Yes, people can be selfish, ignorant or bigoted in any environment, my point is interaction with others beyond one's immediate family does affect the awareness, empathy and boundaries informing ones central mindset are modified.

I think a diverse, dense and open community makes it easier to achieve at least shallow enlightenment, but it's not required. After encountering people from all types of backgrounds and hearing the arguments of a few sociology students, I've come to think that this sort of social conditioning can occur in many types of population densities. What counts is how the society encourages individuals to see themselves as part of a greater whole. Thus I don't buy the stereotype of a suburb as inherently dead minded. Or a small town as naturally small minded. Even someone who spends most of their time alone tilling the land can be educated in the other by the agricultural process.

Plus they have a clear reason for being alone. I think most people crave social interaction and need a good reason if they don't have it.

This is the basis of my dislike of non-places. They aren't isolating for any reason beyond everything being streamlined into utilitarian function to save money. Social patterns narrow not because someone is more or less open, but because unformity, isolation and dehumanization is cheaper.

A remote farm is still a distinct place in societies pattern, one can build a personality upon it. When the world beyond the front door is a mass of monotonous, anonymous homes, miles of blank highway in every direction and the dullest of chain stores beyond that, it's hard to identify with it.

Folks don't go out there thinking this is what they're going to get. They see a cheap home and area with potential. They think, as we all do, that the distances don't matter. Which they may not, if there's no hardship. Some people can feel connection to a small town 100 miles away. But when gas prices make that trip a financial rarity, the paucity of one's surroundings can become grim. Just ask any teen about their perception of their hometown pre and post car.

Plsu people crave non-corporate spaces. When I was growing up in Orlando, there was a dearth of places for young people to hang outside of school. Folks flocked to the mall and movies, but when a plaza opened downtown with a coffee shop next to it, several crowds of social teens flooded it. In these unplaces, there are no spaces which aren't private property, run for profit. This too create a disconnect of basic socialization.
[User Picture]From: [info]seriesfinale
2005-06-30 09:59 pm (UTC)

Re: Interesting

(Link)

Much clearer this time, thanks! Like I said, the initial post often came across as a standard anti-suburbia rant ("...the sole shape to your life outside the pew and the cubicle" in particular seemed pretty harsh and not entirely truthful) but I really do understand and mostly agree with what you're getting at (having spent plenty of time on the Orange Blossom Trail myself).

Although, I do have to say that next to the definition of dehumanization in the dictionary you could put a picture of people crushed onto the red line in the morning on their way to the Loop....speaking of which, it's time for me to leave the office and join the rest of the human cattle!