| Self-aggrandizing granite bastards |
[Jan. 9th, 2008|06:55 am] |
Because it's only fair after I wrote this.
Supposedly there was "record turnout" in the New Hampshire primary. Pffft. Y'know what this record was? 500,000 people.
Again, one of the worst turnouts ever in the City of Chicago was 465,706.
If this tiny number of voters in a one city had this much media influence on a national presidential election, and the city openly manipulated its schedule to attain this power, I think people would be calling bullshit and asking why there wasn't more perspective.
It's no different for a state - the vote isn't meaningless but its significance should be balanced. Especially one which is 93.8% white and one of the wealther states in the nation (half the national poverty percentage).
At the very least Montana could vote at the same time so we could balance things with a tiny sample of white people with a poverty rate above the national level. |
|
|
| Can't predict nomination with 2% of the population? TOTAL ANARCHY. |
[Jan. 9th, 2008|09:07 am] |
Dear Yahoo,
Your site currently has a headline which reads:
Comeback kids create chaos
Clinton's stunning upset and McCain's triumphant win throw both races into turmoil.
When 48 states have not voted in a national race, that's not turmoil. That's democracy.
Sincerely,
Mr. F.
PS: When loud assumptions fail to predict the result of the first private ballot, that's not an "upset" that's "a bad guess".
PPS: If one is being generous, it's "your polling methodology is little better than pure speculation."
(Edited to correct error spotted by imperialshotgun) |
|
|
| A TV post which is also about politics |
[Jan. 9th, 2008|12:01 pm] |
David Simon, producer of the TV show The Wire (which I greatly enjoy), writes this about the pessimism of his show (emphasis mine):Writing to affirm what people are saying about my faith in individuals to rebel against rigged systems and exert for dignity, while at the same time doubtful that the institutions of a capital-obsessed oligarchy will reform themselves short of outright economic depression (New Deal, the rise of collective bargaining) or systemic moral failure that actually threatens middle-class lives (Vietnam and the resulting, though brief commitment to rethinking our brutal foreign-policy footprints around the world). The Wire is dissent; it argues that our systems are no longer viable for the greater good of the most, that America is no longer operating as a utilitarian and democratic experiment. If you are not comfortable with that notion, you won’t agree with some of the tonalities of the show. I would argue that people comfortable with the economic and political trends in the United States right now — and thinking that the nation and its institutions are equipped to respond meaningfully to the problems depicted with some care and accuracy on The Wire (we reported each season fresh, we did not write solely from memory) — well, perhaps they’re playing with the tuning knobs when the back of the appliance is in flames.
Does that mean The Wire is without humanist affection for its characters? Or that it doesn’t admire characters who act in a selfless or benign fashion? Camus rightly argues that to commit to a just cause against overwhelming odds is absurd. He further argues that not to commit is equally absurd. Only one choice, however, offers the slightest chance for dignity. And dignity matters.
All that said, I am the product of a C-average GPA and a general studies degree from a state university and thirteen years of careful reporting about one rustbelt city. Hell do I know. Maybe my head is up my ass.
If The Wire is too pessimistic about the future of the American empire — and I’ve read my Toynbee and Chomsky, so I actually think a darker vision could be credibly argued — no one will be more pleased than me as I am, well, American. |
|
|
| Another pop culture quiz. |
[Jan. 9th, 2008|01:24 pm] |
Name title and the character for these movie or TV quotes I just made up out of thin air. Bonus points for the actor and director.
1. "I'm the owner, and you are?" "Hideously broken, but I look fantastic."
2. "That's very good but if I may interject two points: [holds up fingers] fuck and you."
3. "What you call hubris, I call Texas."
4. "You can keep your badge and gun - I'm taking your eyes."
5. "The klepmomoxies are wee but cunning folk, our cause may not be as lost as you think."
6. "CHILE! [punch] CON! [punch] QUESO! [punch]"
7. "Life can be very long and drama fleeting. You sure this is worth it?"
8. "The interest is compound and rather purient...and there's no early withdrawal."
9. "Today, our blood! Tomorrow, our souls! Our courage - FOREVER."
UPDATE: In comments - ludickid for the win. |
|
|
| In which I engage in speculation. |
[Jan. 9th, 2008|05:04 pm] |
I know it's too soon to be making predictions, but I'm going to say In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale will take an early lead as dumbest film of the year.
If one examines the elements of nouvelle merde (proposed Jean Luc Boldard in his manifesto after making Bagatelle: Points Supérieurs) one finds ItNotK: ADST approaches Perfect Crap.
Let us examine the points of terrible:
Un - It is directed by Uwe Boll. This alone occupies the transcendent level of bad which allows Uwe's to continue to avoid the straight to DVD path.
Deux - It is not just based on a video game, but a computer RPG owned by Microsoft. Alas, John Hodgeman does not narrate.
Trois -The title has a colon.
Quatre - It is a low budget fantasy epic.
Cinq - It puts Jason Statham in a role so stupid and inappropriate it might interrupt his career as Single Redeeming Factor. This might be considered Stratham's Cage film.*
Six - While it does not contain Oscar Winner Jeremy Irons swanning about as in Dungeons and Dragons and Eragon, nor the mystifying presence of other acadamy award winners (see: Bloodrayne), it does have Ray Liotta feigning a lack of shame as an evil wizard.
Sept - It has Matthew Lillard AND post-plastic-surgery Burt Reynolds.
Huit - Our hero is a farmer named "Farmer."
The purity of ItNotK: ADST means one does not even need to see the film to experience the pleasures of so bad it's good. It's so bad it will be good just to imagine what it would be like to pay to see it, followed by the nirvana of not thinking of it again.
*Note: A "Cage" is industry code (as proposed by The Best Show on WLUW) for expending hard won credibility on utterly banal, but well paid, crap. Unlike a "Statham" which is semi-decent pay for dreck with one badass role or sequence. Only for Statham could King be a Cage. For the other actors, it's a Cuba Gooding. |
|
|