The Fengi Newsletter [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Greetings Fellow Comstoks!

[ website | Fengi - lies, damn lies and statistics ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| insane friends of friends extrapolation ]

Thought [Feb. 9th, 2010|01:30 pm]
I've read about the changes to NASA's focus and budget and it seems to come down to one key idea: privatizing space travel.

Thus America officially moves from the narrative which results in The Enterprise to the narrative which produces The Nostromo.
link20 said it all|what you say?

Sports Bar Macho and Its Discontents. [Feb. 9th, 2010|11:18 am]
Warning: This is a rambling and hyperbolic and has incomplete notions.

It seems to me the default position of much of pop culture, especially advertising, is Sports Bar Macho, an insanely reductive, restrictive version of masculinity. Sports Bar Macho divides the world into Manly and Emasculating. The latter has multiple lables from Boring to Bitch, but Manly is defined by cock and balls, so any antithesis involves losing them.

Sports Bar Macho is constantly expanding what is Emasculating, as seen by the Miller Lite Superbowl ad in which reading books was now a girl only activity. Meanwhile the limits of Manly is an ever shrinking set of activities one is not expected to master (as sloth is also manly), responsibilities one cannot expect to satisfy (as stress and frustration are manly) and a non-stop quest of escape through consumption of specific goods and entertainments.

When Emasculating things must be permitted, Sports Bar Macho employs shame, mockery, apology and other forms of containment. For emascualted men are lower than women, for women always have their inferior girl parts, while Not Manly men are unsexed, less than human.

Which leads to paradox of Sports Bar Macho: fucking women is central to being Manly, but women are inherently Emasculating. One's ability to have an identity directly involves the threat of erasing it. This can be seen in Bromances. Women - and chlidren - are the antithesis of everything which defines the Bros, yet fucking is an unavoidable part of being a bro. 40 Year Olds cannot stay virgins, but losing viginity also involves the loss of 40 years of self.

Were homophobia not so central to Sports Bar Macho, one would argue they'd be better off in a male only environment except the mindset is not really about satisfying desires but maintaining appetites for consumption. It is a distinctly Christian Capitalist concept, in which seeking salvation in Christ or consumer goods is never ending, and worldy gratification threatens this power. In both the secular (and UnManly) is not enough (one's job, current car, etc.) as it is tainted (and female) and only worship (via prayer or spending) contains the promise of something better. Jesus is one's own big hardon with a bottomless keg and a game/action flick which never ends.

As a guy, I like many sorts of guy stuff but I find this suffocating.

More concise quotes by others. )Side note: Even though Sports Bar Macho types don't read and I love Mark Twain, I wonder if Huck Finn helped codify a genderized populist duality of masculine individualism vs. feminine society. Yes, this goes back to blaming Eve for dooming man to labor with her sin, but a boy free on the river putting on a dress to survive on shorebound civilzation is rooted deep in the American psyche. Lighting out for the territories is an act of independence as long as the destination is never reached, in some ways, Huck Finn was writing car ad copy.

Also: This doesn't mean I think use of such terms as "Man up" and "that takes balls", or the joys of drinking beers with dudes in a dudely fashion, or saying that girls and boys don't agree on things is verboten or worthless. Or that I don't do these things. Being Macho is part of what makes humans fun and interesting, it's just being aware of the frame and that it's not the only valid one.
link16 said it all|what you say?

Phrases Which Provoke A Physical Response When I Read Them [Feb. 9th, 2010|09:29 am]
"Felt the shin bone crack."

"Slammed my hand in the car door."

"Snapped achilles tendon."

"deceptively sharp edge of the can sliced his thumb."
link2 said it all|what you say?

(no subject) [Feb. 9th, 2010|07:23 am]

SNOOOO-
linkwhat you say?

The devil is chilly. [Feb. 8th, 2010|09:28 pm]
Holy shit. I'm actually impressed by what Meghan McCain said about the Tea Party:
[Tom Tancredo] said, "People who could not even spell the word vote or say it in English put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House whose name is Barack Hussein Obama." And then he went on to say that people at the convention should have to pass literacy tests in order to be able to vote in this country, which is the same thing that happened in the 50's to prevent African Americans from voting. It's innate racism and I think it's why young people are turned off by this movement. And I'm sorry, but revolutions start with young people, not with 65-year-old people talking about literacy tests and people who can't say the word 'vote' in English.
For a moment there, she acted like the daughter of the fantasy of John McCain.
link17 said it all|what you say?

consume, you pussy. [Feb. 8th, 2010|08:20 am]
Last night Deadend Margo and I went to workout at the YMCA for the first time. The physical gratification and sense of accomplishment was, I will admit, increased by knowing I was ignoring the super bowl.

The only thing we saw from the ritual was a fragment of the halftime show at a restaurant. Pete Townsend appeared to run out of breath while singing "it's only a a teenage wasteland" and I laughed.*

Today it was even more gratifying when I saw the corporate misogyny in which the event was marinated. The game itself may have wider meanings, but the creepy guy white noise is ever increasing.

It wasn't just the ugliness of a network helping create an anti-choice ad. The dudeness is amped beyond the usual beer meaning hot girls and male bonding. The act of spending is now angry isolation, a virtual out of the body experience inspired by a visceral hatred of the feminine.



Sitting passively on your fat ass in a machine, burning money going nowhere. That's the way to reclaim your manhood.

Also, since when is eating fruit, i.e. food which tastes good, capitulating to oppressive womanhood? Oh yeah, the Bible.



If you can't stare passively at a screen, you might as well have a vagina, which is the worst thing ever. Don't worry, just reading these words means you are full of screen gazing testosterone (ladies, this is why you shouldn't blog too much).

I mean, honestly, how long is it before some super bowl ad is just three title cards:

HAVING TO PRETEND THE FUCKHOLE IS HUMAN.

DOESN'T THAT SUCK?

DON'T BE A GIRL, BUY OUR SHIT.



-----
*Yes, it was for wrong reasons.

Update: [info]sabotabby identifies the intense vibe of barely restrained violence in that first ad, which comments point out may be due to Michael C. Hall reading the copy in his Dexter voice. In my fantasy this is an intentional subversion by production; the client wanted Tyler Durden, they gave him Patrick Bateman.
link78 said it all|what you say?

a picture of Chet Atkins in a familiar pose [Feb. 6th, 2010|11:14 am]


found by "Comics make no sense"
link1 said it|what you say?

DUANE! [Feb. 6th, 2010|10:07 am]
linkwhat you say?

Being a Consumer Means Being Part of The Problem [Feb. 4th, 2010|01:35 pm]
I've been reading persuasive arguments on why people expecting extremely cheap digital books are unfair and uninformed, pointing out the cost of producing a book involves a lot of expenses and profit sharing, even after one eliminates physical printing and distribution.

I agree with them in general. Then I realize something: if one can find a new release vinyl 45 or CD Single, the cost is $4.99 and up. I sure as hell haven't made arguments for paying $2.50 plus per new song file I've gotten.

I'm not saying it's exactly the same, or that it should work this way. I'm saying capitalism is a funny thing. It's great if people I like can succeed in getting paid for digital with values from the world of physical objects. I believe people should should get paid for content.

Yet if I was into fairness in general, the cost of my collection of music files would exceed what I spent on devices to store and play them. Prior to digital, I did spend more on music than equipment, even with buying used and taping albums from the library. Now, I'm not sure it would balance even including every purchase in my life, and my equipment is cheap and nearly all music acquired by legal (if not paid) means.
link6 said it all|what you say?

Straight Talk. [Feb. 4th, 2010|11:16 am]
"In the almost seventeen years since the 'don't ask, don't tell' legislation was passed, attitudes and circumstances have changed"
- Colin Powell

"The reason why I supported the policy to start with is because General Colin Powell, who was then the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is the one that strongly recommended we adopt this policy in the Clinton administration. I have not heard General Powell or any of the other military leaders reverse their position, just like when on other issues, that people are expert and knowledgeable of, I rely on their opinion. But this is unique. These military leaders are responsible for the very lives of the men and women under their command, and that's why I am especially guided, to a large degree, by their views."
-John McCain, June 2008.

"And I understand the opposition to it, and I've had these debates and discussions, but the day that the leadership of the military comes to me and says, Senator, we ought to change the policy, then I think we ought to consider seriously changing it because those leaders in the military are the ones we give the responsibility to."
-McCain, 2006

What a special special guy.
link8 said it all|what you say?

You proved I was lying, but what I said could still be true. [Feb. 3rd, 2010|04:41 pm]
The Huffington Post, a hotbed of anti-vaccine fearmongering, reacts to the Lancet retraction with the integrity you'd expect:
Neither The Lancet nor Britain's General Medical Council have stated that there is not a connection between vaccines in autism, just that they deem this particular piece of research unethical and incorrect...There are no easy answers to this and there continues to be no sufficient proof that a connection does not exist between the MMR and autism.
Ah Schrödinger's Bullshit - I love this game.

Here's mine: "While the photo of me kissing She-Hulk turned out to be a crudely photoshopped picture, not even my most ardent detractors actually said, let alone offered evidence, that Deadend Margo does not turn into a sexy green giantess when under stress."

Here's a tip for trained medical professionals - when addressing thoroughly discredited research, one might considering avoiding the sort ofhair splitting denials associated with Orly Taitz. Because it makes you a very bad doctor. "What I diagnosed as gangrene was actually a grass stain, but that's doesn't disprove there's rot - so the leg is coming off."
link16 said it all|what you say?

Like Money on Fire [Feb. 3rd, 2010|02:07 pm]
I question the idea of buying a Kindle - or any e-reader - primarily to save money on books.

Because an honest accounting of savings would factor in cost of the device and previous spending habits. This means saving $250 on purchases one would make without the Kindle before the net benefit starts.

If one reads a new release hardback a week, this won't be difficult. If one frequents libraries and used book stores has shelves full of books one has been trying to finish for years, perhaps it's better to think of the Kindle as a toy unto itself. Or not at all, really.
link20 said it all|what you say?

One thing stands out about the journal above all. [Feb. 3rd, 2010|12:49 pm]
I'm a bad spelling machine.
link1 said it|what you say?

Better Late Than Never [Feb. 3rd, 2010|12:08 pm]
Finally.
British medical journal The Lancet says it has retracted a flawed study linking the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine to autism and bowel disease.

The Lancet published the controversial paper by Andrew Wakefield and colleagues in 1998. British parents abandoned the vaccine in droves, leading to a resurgence of measles. Subsequent studies found no proof the vaccine is connected to autism.

Ten of the study's 13 authors renounced the study's conclusions, and The Lancet has previously said it should never have published the research. "We fully retract this paper from the published record," its editors said in a statement on Tuesday.

Wakefield and two colleagues face being stripped of their right to practice medicine in Britain.
I wonder if it's possible to revoke indigo mom licenses.
link4 said it all|what you say?

This American Irritant [Feb. 2nd, 2010|06:20 pm]
This weekend This American Life rebroadcast the episode about guns.

It's an okay episode until the segment which Ira presents at the start of the show thus:
Act Four. Potato Potahto.

Two people who've nearly died in gun battles describe what it's like, getting shot at. They draw opposite conclusions from their near death experiences.
The segment interweaves two subjects:

1. Mike Robbins, a Chicago cop who was ambushed and shot multiple times and survived and became a gun control advocate.

2. Suzanna Gratia Hupp, who managed to escape the Texas Luby's massacre without being shot at and then worked to change the state's concealed carry law.

No matter how you feel about guns, you can see the annoying flaw here.

Ira actually asks Hupp this question: "What do make of someone who goes through something very similar to what you went through and concludes the opposite?" And she chuckles and makes a patronizing comment.

At this point I'm snarling at Ira, "The only thing these stories have in common is a gun, you dishonest fuck." Robbins alludes to this when it's his turn to answer, but it doesn't stop the segment from playing them off each other like two sides of the same coin. It's almost equally unfair, except Hupp is the calmer interview subject and gets the last word, led by a friendly question from Ira.

This isn't bias so much as TAL being so impressed with a clever idea rather obvious flaws are disregarded.

What bugs me is TAL's (carefully constructed) conversational style is meant to signify honest imperfection and lack of pretense. It usually does better than a lot of journalism, even doing stories about imposed narratives. But TAL retains enough of the detached authority persona to indulge some dubious narratives of their own at times, and it's often painfully obvious.

EDIT TO ADD: Of course, there's always a narrative authority, even if there's no narrator, the moment events are recorded. It's more about how one deals with it.
link4 said it all|what you say?

If I must live in a conspiracy thriller, I want better lighting. [Feb. 2nd, 2010|12:06 pm]
If our taxes are underwriting something akin to a real life SD-6, Foggy Bottom damn well better start hiring more attractive agents.
In the midst of two wars and the fight against Al Qaeda, the CIA is offering operatives a chance to peddle their expertise to private companies on the side — a policy that gives financial firms and hedge funds access to the nation’s top-level intelligence talent, POLITICO has learned.

In one case, these active-duty officers moonlighted at a hedge-fund consulting firm that wanted to tap their expertise in “deception detection,”...the close ties between active-duty and retired CIA officers at one consulting company show the degree to which CIA-style intelligence gathering techniques have been employed by hedge funds and financial institutions in the global economy.

The firm is called Business Intelligence Advisors, and it is based in Boston. BIA was founded and is staffed by a number of retired CIA officers, and it specializes in the arcane field of “deception detection.” BIA’s clients have included Goldman Sachs and the enormous hedge fund SAC Capital Advisors, according to spokesmen for both firms.

BIA has employed active-duty CIA officers in the past, although BIA president Cheryl Cook said that has “not been the case with BIA for some time.”

But the ties between BIA and the intelligence world run deep. The name itself was chosen as a play off CIA. And the presence of so many former CIA personnel on the payroll at BIA causes confusion as to whether the intelligence firm is actually an extension of the agency itself. As a result, BIA places a disclaimer in some of its corporate materials to clarify that it is not, in fact, controlled by Langley.
I look forward to seeing Leon Panetta in Godspell.
link1 said it|what you say?

Taking sides [Feb. 2nd, 2010|09:25 am]
TEAM BIGELOW



It's just a better movie.


Edited to add: Though I'd be pleased if anyone but Cameron won.
link4 said it all|what you say?

The nerds will understand. [Feb. 1st, 2010|11:00 pm]
The comic is pretty much cashing in on dead horse flogging and nothing more, but I was still disturbed to find out Brad Meltzer is scripting Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Joss hand picked him, and, I just discovered, wrote a fawning introduction to Identity Crisis.

Wow. That's really fucked up.
link10 said it all|what you say?

My own pet theory about Amazon. [Feb. 1st, 2010|10:09 am]
Amazon expected the Kindle to be the next iPod, but it's starting to seem more like the Betamax.

Macmillan decided upon a different e-book strategy to compensate for, and take advantage of, the Kindle non-superpower status. You don't give someone Apple-level influence when they are already starting to look like late 90s Atari.

Astute folk like [info]nihilistic_kid pointed out Amazon's attempt to act like the Gazprom of books was an audacious bluff.

I can't tell if it was a delusional/desperate or calculated one. Did they think they had a chance of keeping a fixed price, or were they angling for some other concessions and PR cover for pricing changes?

After all, Amazon was taking a loss on some $9.99 titles in hopes of market domination and dictating terms to both producers and consumers - not because it necessarily wanted to do so.

The bad press and animosity generated may have been worth absolving themselves of price hikes which may not hurt their bottom line. Especially if those prices apply to their e-book competitors as well.

On the whole, however, Amazon doesn't seem that clever. I mean, their e-reader is quite highly priced for a means of creating a significant exclusive customer base via users. Perhaps they only need those for whom a $249 price tag is the start of their book budget.

I'm not in the best position to judge, since I rarely do the type of book shopping which would qualify for free shipping and thus (in my view) justify using Amazon.
link14 said it all|what you say?

The problem, you have missed it. [Jan. 31st, 2010|11:46 am]
Is #amazonfail the proper term if the failure is an inability to understand retail and market combined with an inadvertant insistance on paying more for shitty DRM?
link17 said it all|what you say?

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]