The Fengi Newsletter [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
www.fengi.com

[ website | Fengi - lies, damn lies and statistics ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| insane friends of friends extrapolation ]

Question for the Politically Saavy [May. 13th, 2008|10:17 am]
Have any of the presidential candidates (or even candidates for Senate or Congress) said anything about special prosecutors to investigate contractor malfeasance in Iraq? Someone has to go to jail for this shit.
link6 said it all|what you say?

The Memo [May. 13th, 2008|07:36 am]
TO: Humanity

FROM: The Earth

RE: Residency

Say, it's getting sort of crowded here isn't it? It's a bit of a strain on the cleaning staff.

Don't worry, I'll take care of it.
link1 said it|what you say?

Milo Minderbinder Triumphant [May. 12th, 2008|04:02 pm]
Who know M&M Enterprises was not satire but business model?

Alas, literary references cannot prevent me from sliding from amused to disgusted. This is fucking bullshit.
The first to testify was Frank Cassaday, a former KBR employee who worked as an ice plant operator in Fallujah in 2004 and 2005. "Ice was a very valuable commodity in Iraq that was regularly stolen and bartered for other goods," he told the committee. He recalled how a convoy of U.S. Marines, in preparation for an operation that would take them outside the wire for several days, requested 28 bags of ice to keep their food fresh in the desert heat. They received only three. "The ice foreman was cheating the troops out of ice at the same time that he was trading the ice for DVDs, CDs, food, and other items at the Iraqi shops across the street," Cassaday said. "This foreman would change the ice tally sheets at the distribution area I worked in to make it seem as though we had handed out more ice to the Marines than we actually did."

...he later observed his colleagues returning to KBR's camp with equipment they had stolen from the U.S. military, including refrigerators, artillery round detonators, two rocket launchers, and about 800 rounds of small arms ammunition. After he informed the KBR camp manager of the thefts, Marines searched the camp with dogs to recover the stolen property. For his trouble, Cassaday said, KBR security officers jailed him in his tent for two days. He then spent another four days in "protective custody" before being transferred, against his will, to work in a laundry.

The practice of stealing equipment and supplies destined for the U.S. military was so pervasive that KBR employees invented a slang term to describe it: "drug deals."
As Harry Shearer observed, you know it's bad when drug trafficking is the cover story.
But thefts were not limited to military supplies, said Linda Warren, another former KBR employee who testified at the hearing. Upon her arrival in Baghdad in 2004, she was shocked by the number of contractors involved in criminal activity. "KBR employees who were contracted to perform construction duties inside palaces and municipal buildings were looting," she said. "Not only were they looting, but they had a system in place to get contraband out of the country so it could be sold on eBay. They stole artwork, rugs, crystal, and even melted down gold to make spurs for cowboy boots." Like Cassaday, when she complained to her superiors about the thefts, she was punished. She said her vehicle was taken away, her movements were closely monitored, and her access to phones and the Internet were cut off.
But that's not all:
Barry Halley, a former project manager for Worldwide Network Services, a Washington, D.C.-based firm that was working on subcontract for DynCorp. According to Halley, his site manager in Iraq, who he said was employed by a "major defense contractor," moonlighted as the leader of a prostitution ring serving American contractors in Iraq that indirectly caused the death of a colleague. "A co-worker unrelated to the ring was killed when he was traveling in an unsecure car and shot performing a high-risk mission," he told the committee. "I believe that my co-worker could have survived if he had been riding in an armored car. At the time, the armored car that he would otherwise have been riding in was being used by a manager to transport prostitutes from Kuwait to Baghdad." The prostitution ring was shut down when the company's home office learned of it, but, Halley said, the manager who controlled it retained his job, moving on to work another contract in Haiti.
link1 said it|what you say?

Don't Worry Paul, You Are Still The Uncoolest! [May. 12th, 2008|10:18 am]
Paul Kix, senior editor at Boston magazine and white guy in his late 30s I was wrong, he's still in his 20s and writing like an old man:
More than anything I'm embarrassed. Since when did young black men, heretofore the arbiters of pop culture, become so lame? And since when did the citizens of that culture not know the difference?
Salon always finds new ways to mine the genre of "oh god, please stop writing and get a clue" and today it produces a classic.

Hip-hop is no longer cooler than me
It's a sad day when a farm boy from Iowa can say that about a musical genre he once loved. When will the awful dance crazes end?

Paul Kix opens his essay by reminiscing about his childhood in 1989: "I was on the bus, with an older fat kid everyone called Speed sitting the row in front of me. Speed and I had a special bond: We were perhaps the only kids in central Iowa to love rap." Why yes, because in 1989, Iowa only no one had access to Mtv and Paul's mom didn't exist until he was born.

When Kix heard NWA, considered edgey but not exactly unknown, he apparently discounted Will Smith (who won the first rap grammy in 1989) and Young MC defining heavy rotation hip-hop. Now he takes a look at a few heavy rotation acts and popular dance steps and proclaims:
A genre whirled out of the grist of urban pain and worn as a low-slung hat and baggy jeans has somehow slipped on clown shoes and taken up night classes in pantomime. Its dances are silly, its beats infantile, its rhymes lazy. I am sorry to report this, but hip-hop is no longer cooler than me.
But that's not all:
Bo Ryan is the men's basketball coach at the University of Wisconsin. He is old, he's white, and he should have nothing to do with pop-cultural relevance. And yet there he is, online, dancing the Soulja Boy...if you compare Ryan's rendition with the original, you, too, might find yourself preferring the subtlety of Ryan's moves. (His cross steps aren't as aggrandized, for one.) Are these not trying days when a 60-year-old Wisconsinite improves "the game"...
I guess at popular, easy to learn dance steps are the defining point of an entire musical culture. Clearly this is an age where Anton Scalia is break dancing and krumping is something suburban housewives do while making pancakes.

Kix narrows all of hip hop down into Souljah Boy, avoiding Lupe Fiasco, Anacron or - well you can fill all the 40s at a hipster ironic ghetto party with what Kix omits - so he can say "young black men, heretofore the arbiters of pop culture" are "so lame".

Barack Obama is close to getting a presidential nomination with some help from young and black voters, and Salon prints an article saying black men these days are so much lamer and unsaavy than a white guy who heard a few albums back in the day. I think there's a subtext here.

Mr. Kix, for the love of all white music fans over 30 25, don't act like you speak for anyone but your peckerwood shithead self.
link18 said it all|what you say?

Reckless Girls Imperiled by Hypotheticals [May. 11th, 2008|12:47 pm]
In the print version of the New York Times Magazine, the headline for an article about injuries in girls sports says, in all caps:

EVERYONE WANTS GIRLS TO HAVE AS MANY OPPORTUNITIES IN SPORTS AS BOYS. BUT CAN WE LIVE WITH THE GREATER RATE OF INJURIES THEY SUFFER?

Short answer: Yes, when it is sensationalized sexist spin.

The article is OMG WTF BBQ TITLE IX BAD based mostly upon knee injuries for women. That sports injuries are a problem is established, that these injuries might be different from men is plausible, that there is a crisis of greater injuries for girls is, to be polite, finessed.

Here's some representative quotes (emphasis mine.:
Comprehensive statistics on total sports injuries are in short supply. The N.C.A.A. compiles the best numbers, but even these are based on just a sampling of colleges and universities. For younger athletes, the numbers are less specific and less reliable. Some studies have measured sports injuries by emergency-room visits, which usually follow traumatic events like broken bones. A.C.L. and other soft-tissue injuries often do not lead to an E.R. visit; the initial examination typically occurs at the office of a pediatrician or an orthopedic surgeon. Studies of U.S. high-school athletics indicate that, when it comes to raw numbers, boys suffer more sports injuries. But the picture is complicated by football and the fact that boys still represent a greater percentage of high-school athletes.

Girls are more likely to suffer chronic knee pain as well as shinsplints and stress fractures. Some research indicates that they are more prone to ankle sprains, as well as hip and back pain. And for all the justifiable attention paid to concussions among football players, females appear to be more prone to them in sports that the sexes play in common. A study last year by researchers at Ohio State University and Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, reported that high-school girls who play basketball suffer concussions at three times the rate of boys, and that the rate for high-school girls who play soccer is about 1.5 times the rate for boys. According to the N.C.A.A. statistics, women who play soccer suffer concussions at nearly identical rates as male football players.
...
The Injury Surveillance reports include commentary as well as data, and in 2007 the authors stated that an A.C.L. rupture is “a rare event” and advised against making too much of the tears sustained by male and female collegiate athletes across a range of sports. But a young woman playing college soccer can easily generate 200 exposures a year between her regular season in the fall, off-season training in the spring and club play in the summer.
...
So imagine a hypothetical high-school soccer team of 20 girls, a fairly typical roster size, and multiply it by the conservative estimate of 200 exposures a season...Over the course of four years, 4 out of the 20 girls on that team will rupture an A.C.L.
Imagine a 20 girls being allowed to drive cars without male supervision for a year, multiply it by an estimate of 2 accidents per month - some of them will die twice.

This quote from a section on an actual positive idea - a program training girls how to avoid injuries - shows the fact-ish journalism of author Michael Sokolove:
The Santa Monica Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Research Foundation published results of its trial in the American Journal of Sports Medicine. The research was nonrandomized and therefore not the highest order of scientific research. (The coaches of teams doing the exercises made a choice to participate; the control group consisted of those who declined.) Nevertheless, the results were attention-grabbing.
Attention grabbing as a substitute for "significant enough for NYT magazine."

EDIT TO ADD: It seems the key (yet understudied) issue of how women can be taught how to avoid injuries indicates girls sports lag in injury prevention, not that girls are fragile things unworthy of sport. This idea is mentioned, but buried after much alarmism.
link21 said it all|what you say?

A Grump [May. 9th, 2008|10:19 am]
One of my supervisors kids, a young boy, has been enjoying horseplay with a co-worker for the last half hour, including a cardboard box battle.

Working parents sometimes have childcare issues, which is just fine.

But I want my workplace to remain an adult friendly space. Employee needs come first. This is driving me up the wall.
link50 said it all|what you say?

These pancakes are great [May. 9th, 2008|07:57 am]
On the other hand, here's the Onion:
Number Of Acceptable Things Candidates Can Say Now Down To Four

NEW YORK—After Sen. Barack Obama's comments last week about what he typically eats for dinner were criticized by Sen. Hillary Clinton as being offensive to both herself and the American voters, the number of acceptable phrases presidential candidates can now say are officially down to four. "At the beginning of 2007 there were 38 things candidates could mention in public that wouldn't be considered damaging to their campaigns, but now they are mostly limited to 'Thank you all for coming,' and 'God bless America,'" ABC News chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos said on Sunday's episode of This Week...
The rest here.
link1 said it|what you say?

That Guy is within and without [May. 9th, 2008|07:49 am]
Despite everything, I find myself wanting Clinton to stick it out if for no other reason than to rebuff the gleeful avalanche of "leave already bitch". The final word in that phrase may not be uttered, or even thought, by many criticizing her, but in the aggregate it's there.

Watching Clinton flounder and use dog whistle racism and right wing rhetoric is painful, because it was unecessary as negative campaigning. It was an ugly choice driven by white entitlement.

I deplore those choices yet still feel for her due to the obvious sexism she faces - perhaps not only from the outside but from the inside.

Recently the New Republic printed a piece on Clinton staff turmoil which was obscured by a nasty sexist cover and condescending headline.

The article itself, however, is decent, and indicates many campaign flaws may come from dudes unwilling to let women have full control:
In the run-up to Hillary's February 25 foreign policy speech at George Washington University, her top strategist felt that the campaign's speechwriters, overseen by policy chief Neera Tanden, were headed in the wrong direction. Rather than sitting down to talk with them, Penn- -renowned for his lack of interpersonal skills--struck out on his own, setting up a parallel speechwriting effort using outside scribes. Unfortunately for him, Tanden's shop learned of his end-run and was royally brassed off. Fingers were pointed and accusations hurled, prompting Maggie Williams to hold an emergency conference call on the Sunday night before the Monday speech. Among those assembled to confer with Penn, reports one witness, were Tanden, her speechwriting team, and foreign policy gurus Andrew Shapiro and Lee Feinstein. But, when asked by Tanden and Williams to explain his problem with the address, all Penn initially could do was repeat over and over, "This speech doesn't begin to meet the minimum standards of being acceptable." And, "If she delivers this speech, she will lose." Williams had to keep soothing Penn, prodding him to be specific about his objections, recalls the witness. Eventually, everyone had their say, and Tanden's people were sent off to work out the final details. A full-blown meltdown was averted. But Penn's relations with the rest of the campaign had suffered yet another blow.

...for Team Hillary, there is always Bill. Campaign insiders acknowledge that the former president has never been wholly manageable...As one adviser observes, "You can question him, but you can't ever tell him what to do." Most notable, of course, are the public outbursts...But public pronouncements are only a fragment of the picture. As Hillary's campaign struggles, an obviously frustrated Bill and "his people" have taken a greater hand in operations. Immediately post-Iowa, veteran Clintonites like Steve Richetti, Doug Sosnik, and Roy Spence became major players. The president himself announced that he needed an office and would be coming in every day to make phone calls and get "involved."...In the meantime, out went Solis Doyle--never highly regarded by Bill's crew--and in came Williams, who, though a loyal Hillarylander, also has a close and mutually respectful relationship with the former president. Bill's influence waxed further, say insiders, as Williams brought in her team, which included a number of folks considered as much "his people" as Hillary's.
link8 said it all|what you say?

Because I'm 13. [May. 8th, 2008|05:30 pm]
(Pointed out by [info]ruckawriter, so blame him.)



First thought: "Verified by multiple studies of the lakefront in summer..."
link3 said it all|what you say?

OH HILLARY CLINTON NOOOO! [May. 8th, 2008|05:16 pm]
The ability of Stopping Your Mouth On The Win is a skill which seems to vanish under stress. People start with a somewhat reasonable point and keep adding connotations until they reveal something very wrong.

Hillary Clinton's campaign has been nosing around the racial divide for some time, largely through proxies. Alas, Clinton herself strode over into the ugly, in a USA today article with the ironic headline "Clinton makes case for wide appeal" (indicating the reporter may not have picked up on it until the update):
"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."

"There's a pattern emerging here," she said.

Clinton rejected any idea that her emphasis on white voters could be interpreted as racially divisive. "These are the people you have to win if you're a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that."
OH HRC NO!

Yeah, it's a pattern all right. One which began when Geraldine "What? What'd I say?" Ferraro open her mouth many weeks back.

But this leap from righteous to stupid has deep roots in America. Consider early feminist hero Elizabeth Cady Stanton. These days she's better known for being tarnished by her speech decrying the exclusion of women from the 15th Amendment which revealed a nasty side of her politics.

The speech starts out well enough, presenting a stridently populist idea a notion of universal sufferage as inclusive as one can get (this section is not as often quoted):
A government, based on the principle of caste and class, can not stand. The aristocratic idea, in any form, is opposed to the genius of our free institutions, to our own declaration of rights, and to. the civilization of the age. All artificial distinctions, whether of family, blood, wealth, color, or sex, are equally oppressive to the subject classes, and equally destructive to national life and prosperity.
It's too bad Stanton doesn't stop there, as she would have a legendary quote instead of notorious one. Alas, as she continues her rhetoric moves beyond of general equality to focus on the offended superiority of white ladies.
We see this in every department of legislation, and it is a common remark, that unless some new virtue is infused into our public life the nation is doomed to destruction. Will the foreign element, the dregs of China, Germany, England, Ireland, and Africa supply this needed force, or the nobler types of American womanhood who have taught our presidents, senators, and congressmen the rudiments of all they know ? Please. Stop. Talking. )
OH ELIZABETH CADY NOOO!

This can't be excused as the ignorance of the times. Cady, an informed contemporary of Fredrick Douglas, declares "All artificial distinctions, whether of family, blood, wealth, color, or sex, are equally oppressive" then abandons this to rant about "the political inferiors of unlettered and unwashed". Apparently some artificial distinctions aren't so bad after all, this mid-speech hypocrisy might be explained by her outrage at injustice over being denied the vote, but not justified.

The same thing applies now. Clinton has been subjected to pressures unlike any male candidate, but this cannot excuse equating "white" with "hard-working Americans". BONUS POINTS: Her claim may not be true.
link3 said it all|what you say?

Mayor Daley Destroys The Music Scene in the Name of Order [May. 8th, 2008|12:16 pm]
The city of Chicago is trying to pass an insanely draconian promoter's liscense which would effectively wipe out a large portion of the low budget independent scene. The last time it went down to defeat due to public outcry.

It passed out of committee today without any public input. It goes to a full city council on May 18th.

Jim DeRogatis explains:
If approved by the committee and the City Council, the law would require anyone promoting any event drawing more than 100 people to obtain a license — even if they are working with a well-established and already licensed promoter.

Licensees would also have to carry at least $300,000 in commercial liability insurance (even if the venue is insured), and they would have to be at least 21 years old (...several of the top promoters in Chicago actually started their careers at age 18 or 19).

...if, say, a local fanzine wanted to promote a monthly concert featuring the bands in its new issue at a well-established local club of 200 capacity, the editors would have to apply for a promoters’ license and meet all of the requirements and expenses, even if the club already has a license and can boast of a clean record of trouble-free events. The same would hold true of many regular benefit gigs.
But that's not all:
Anyone promoting a musical event would need to be fingerprinted and pay a licensing fee as high as $2,000 (on top of securing the $300,000 insurance); promoters would have to pass criminal background checks, and they would have to notify the commander of the local police district and sign written contracts with venue owners.
Of course, this only applies to independents and small timers - concert venues of over 500 capacity will be exempt from the law.

No one in the music business in Chicago - including the large, wealthy promoters - supports this law. It's insanely draconian and will kill the live music business as well as destroy the underground which allows Chicago to thrive. It also means a massive crackdown on any performance or event in quasi legal spaces. No more "it's okay as long as you only ask for donations".

More information is here with full text of the law and here and here.

Again, it goes to a full city council on May 14th. More action information can be found here at the Chicago Music Commission website (although they probably aren't interested in protecting raw spaces).

Call your alderman. Get this stopped. EDITED TO ADD: Got the date wrong. It's the 14th.
link14 said it all|what you say?

Good Morning [May. 8th, 2008|08:21 am]
No one is down like Canadians are down. This video vaguely reminds me of GTA: Vice City and CSI: Miami.

link7 said it all|what you say?

Speaking of Rumors [May. 7th, 2008|04:37 pm]
Is this quote true?

"You have been nominated to run for one of two positions reserved for LiveJournal users on the LiveJournal, Inc. Advisory Board.

This position will require one in-person meeting in Istanbul per year.

Four additional times each year the Advisory Board will have a scheduled conference call."

Istanbul? Really? Doesn't this go a bit beyond a "weed out" factor? Apparently so, though LJ pays for it.

Which makes me think it's a trap. If there's one thing Hostel clients love, it's hunting fan fic types and other bloggers...
link22 said it all|what you say?

Good Lies Close Held [May. 7th, 2008|04:33 pm]
(Lyrics by The Notwist)

we'll remember good lies
when
we carry them home
with us
to our bedside table and our coffee sets


My cardinal rule is never impose yourself on cubicle gossip. Today I broke it for a moment.

A group was discussing kids these days and the threat of oral sex parties - girls wear different lipsticks and boys try to collect all colors on their dicks.

we'll remember good lies
when
they live in a room
with us
use our kitchen table
and our little beds


This is a pornographic esclation of the jelly braclets as sex code myth, itself a playground variation on the old "sex tab" legend.
Attempts to verify the rumor by talking to real, live teenagers yielded only "hoots of derision and more than a few 'yucks,'" according to one Chicago Tribune article. When a marketing firm called Teenage Research Unlimited asked a group of approximately 300 teenagers if they were aware of any sexual implications attached to wearing jelly bracelets they got vague, ambiguous answers. "They knew of a friend who had a friend who had a friend who knew about this," a spokesperson for the firm told the Associated Press. "But no one could point a finger to anyone who was actually doing this."

This ambiquity jibes with what folklorists have said about historical precedents. Rumors of everyday objects functioning as "sexual coupons" are nothing new in teen culture, observes Barbara Mikkelson of Snopes.com. During the 1970s, pull tabs from beer and soft drink cans were imbued with sexually redeemable value in some places.
we'll remember good lies
when
they're always with us in our beds
even when we shake our heads


Read more... )
link9 said it all|what you say?

Happy Ending (of Sorts) [May. 6th, 2008|06:18 pm]
Luckily, I was home sick with the flu so going to the Mac store was possible.

The guy got it to work and gave me his card to call him for a replacement if it acts up again.

I had thought the thing had bricked because it wouldn't power up and didn't respond to the reset procedure. Turns out sometimes you have to do it multiple times in a row while plugged in to a power source.

The reason why it bricked: I have an audio book on the Nano, but the computer I last used didn't have "show audio books" menu enabled.

Audiobooks are read differently than other mp3 files as they have both internal track markers the main track and the "remember last playback position" option.

This internal conflict apparently makes it difficult for the Nano it recognize its library and boot up without using reset.

This took me over two hours, mostly due to a train slowdown.

Luckily I didn't have an HBO moment.
linkwhat you say?

More Fool Me [May. 6th, 2008|02:25 pm]
So last month I went to the Apple store because the battery on my Ipod Nano V.1 was dying. For $75 they fixed it - by giving me a refurbished one.

Today it bricked. Entirely. I'm pretty sure they're gonna say I'm S.O.L.
link8 said it all|what you say?

Cool. [May. 6th, 2008|11:40 am]
Cute and political. Yay!

link6 said it all|what you say?

It's like the Anti-Sorkin [May. 5th, 2008|08:15 pm]
Why David Shore is better than the Sorkin.

The West Wing had a meta-episode attacking online fandom, which continued with even more bitterness in Studio 60.

Meanwhile, House kidnaps the star of his favorite soap, whom he has diagnosed because he watches the show so intently. It could only be better if House has written fan fiction, but I don't think they're that meta.
link10 said it all|what you say?

It actually works [May. 5th, 2008|10:33 am]
Referring back to point dos in this post. Two vendors I work with merged last year, and now the more organized of the two is, for some reason, adopting the less functional billing format for their invoices. Instead of ranting about the chaos which will ensue, I'm going to growl at the the newly disorganized paperwork, sniff it and make biscuits on them, then process them as if nothing was wrong.
link2 said it all|what you say?

Home Boot Office [May. 5th, 2008|07:23 am]
This weekend Deadend Margo and I deemed "going HBO" to be a term for throwing up, referring to the inevitable moment when serious cable (or cable aspirant) dramas prove their cred by having someone blow chunks. I wonder if actors now seek out such things - you want a death scene and you want that vomit moment.

Blood and puke means drama, puke alone means comedy.
link4 said it all|what you say?

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]